Being Elizabeth In A Lydia World
Pride and Prejudice is one of the few chick-lit books I feel comfortable reading. It is a truth universally acknowledged that Jane Austen’s work is a classic of gigantic proportions. Countless writers have quoted Austen and attempted to mimic her style (as I unashamedly do now.)
However, it is not her style that brings me back for more Pride and Prejudice. The characters are what catch my imagination—notably that of Elizabeth Bennett. She’s been dubbed the best female character ever penned, but I think I’ve stumbled onto an overlooked truth about Miss Elizabeth: she is incomplete. It wasn’t
A “foil” is a literary term meaning, “One that by contrast underscores or enhances the distinctive characteristics of another.” A foil is a character possessing traits that are opposite from the main character, therefore illuminating the main character’s fine qualities.
What immortal Jane Austen character have we forgotten? None other than
To some, “modesty” is another antiquated word from Austen’s era. To others, it may be commonly used but rarely understood. Properly defined, modesty is the special combination of unpretentiousness and discretion; it is a desire not to draw undue attention to self. Chew for a minute on what Webster’s 1828 states:
“…modesty springs no less from principle than from feeling, and is manifested by retiring, unobtrusive manners, assuming less to itself than others are willing to yield, and conceding to others are all due honor and respect, or even more than they expect or require….In females, modesty has the like character as in males; but the word is used also as synonymous with chastity, or purity of manners. In this sense, modesty results from purity of mind, or from the fear of disgrace and ignominy fortified by education and principle.”
What makes Elizabeth Bennett so special? Compared to her sister’s immodesty, we admire her self-control. She’s characterized by quiet good sense—not a desire to be noticed. Therefore, we notice her.
The contrast between
Note: No, that deja-vu feeling doesn't mean you're crazy. This is a revised post from 2006.
Labels: modesty


13 Comments:
It is most definitely a "lost virtue" and it is important to me because I believe Scripture says "be holy for I am holy" and to "set our minds on things above." Hard to do if we are busy encouraging others (guys) to stumble. Ano no, it was not always important to me! Praise God I am not the same person I was. That is one of the beauties of growing in your faith though....getting to reflect and realize there are changes from the inside out. That is one reason I like this blog...it encourages me to think through issues.
Great post, Hannah! Sadly, modesty does indeed seem to be a lost virtue. Most people automatically get uncomfortable or even up in arms when they even hear it discussed! There was a time when it was considered a wonderful thing however... I'm looking foward to the next post on this topic.
Yes, modesty is lost in most circles today. Even the church has a time hard of representing Christ in their dress. Modesty has always been important to me because my parents were wise in bringing me up that way, though the temptation at times has been very...well tempting. And I never have forgiven Jane Austen for that slight...
Well, I don't think it's LOST but I think it's definitely quite well hidden. :) However, as these comments show, it is still existent in our world in small pockets! Yes, it is important to me. Modesty is very important to me and has been from a young age. My out-working of modesty has undergone some changes over the years, but for the majority of my life it was something that my parents taught and then I took for myself.
I am interested to see what else you have to say. :) Especially being a P&P fan and all...
I understand your dislike of shopping! Clothes shopping is one of the necessary evils in my opinion. Modesty is very important to me, and the selections at most stores are discouraging to say the least. I enjoyed this post and am looking forward to part 2!
I'm new to blogs here, but i simply loved your modesty post! I understand how hard it is to shop for mice and modesty clothes. I want to say I stand with you on modesty!
~Ashley~
"...has modesty become a lost virtue? Has our culture forgotten what modesty is? Have Christians forgotten the definition of modesty and how it should be applied?"
Hannah Beth, yes to all of the above.
Your official questions:
* In your opinion, is modesty a “lost virtue” in the world today? Why/why not?
Yes, mostly. Some Christians still follow a decent code, but honestly, most of them don't even think about it, or they even despise it. I'm not kidding.
* Is modesty important to you?
VERY!!!! We have Christian brothers there that have been instructed by Christ and His followers to "remain pure of heart." They can't do that when we're flaunting the temptation in their faces [whether intentional or not]. I personally do NOT want to lead my brothers astray, even if I'd rather be wearing something else.
'course, that doesn't mean that we can't look nice. In fact, the Bible talks about wearing scarlet and preparing good clothing for the family (Prov. 31). So, I don't have to wear a paper sac or anything, I [we] need to be careful that our dress does not even tempt our brothers.
(Now, some things do fall under Christian liberty, but there still should be some general "rules" that Christian women should follow. We just don't anymore, it seems.... )
Great post, Hannah Beth!
Excellent post.
Indeed,
Modesty seems to be fading in our culture.
This is most unfortunate.
Pride and Prejudice was an excellent book.
(I haven’t seen the new movie yet)
If you girls need a reason to dress modestly,
Look no further than what kind of man each girl in the book attracted.
to follow the discusssion above.
Women should not be made to feel as though there bodies are "lustful" or they are "temptresses" -- they should be treated as human beings.
And no, i do not believe it is ONLY what is comfortable...I believe it is about what is comfortable FOR THE OCCASION. A bikini to church is NOT appropriate. Nor is a long dress to play soccer in.
It is offensive that as a mother, a woman would teach her child to be ashamed of what her body looks like, and feel that she MUST hide it with her clothing to prevent men from acting out.
it is NOT the woman's responsibility as to a man acting out. That is unfair and offensiv.
Further, who says that women don't respond to looks....and more to touch? why do you believe that? You are just furthering the objectification of women by saying that and by living your life that way. It is offensive.
Wow! This is amazing! It is so hard to stereotype modesty, as I well know. Modesty is more than dress, it is about how we conduct ourselves. I am really praying about writing a book on this subject. I feel people need to know that while modesty doesn't mean jumpers, it doesn't mean flirting and being the center of attention either.
Oh, I hope you don't mind, but I added you to my sidebar. The address: www.howgreatishisfaithfulness.blogspot.com. Feel free to stop by!Blessings!
haha - yeah, but Lydia has a lot more fun!
Plus, this world today isn't a Victorian novel where a woman pines away for Mr. Darling.
women should go after what they want.
I agree with one of the other comments.
"I don't think modesty is a lost virtue, just well hidden".
It's not lost, because we're doing it! We've kept modesty alive and it will be that way until we're gone (which won't be for awhile!). :)
Anonymous (who commented last),
Lydia may have had more fun, but it was only momentary. She gained nothing in the end, but a husband who didn't pay her any attention and let his eyes stray.
We're not pining for Mr. Darcy, we're waiting for him.
"Women should go after what they want."
I'm pretty sure that we as young Christian women should "go after" what Christ wants, not what we want. We are sinful human beings, and if we followed our own desires we would get nowhere but further into the mire of sin and despair.
And Kate, I do not mean to start a whole argument about this, but yes, women do have a responsibility to keep men from stumbling. It is not unfair; it is the truth. This does not mean that women are solely responsible if a man does fall into sin; his reaction is his own responsibility. But CAUSING the reaction is ours.
If we are pure, if we are humble servants of Christ, should we not reflect it on the outside? This is not to say we should be "ashamed" of our bodies; but we don't have to flaunt "what we got" to prove we're happy with our self-image.
Christian men and women both have responsibilities to remain pure and upright in this generation of wickedness.
Thank you for this post, Hannah.
Post a Comment
<< Home